Erwinia carotovora |

Last updated: 25/08/2025
|
 |
(Also known as: Bacillus carotovorus Jones; Pectobacterium carotovorum Jones) |
The following alerts are based on the data in the tables below. An absence of an alert does not imply the substance has no implications for human health, biodiversity or the environment but just that we do not have the data to form a judgement. These hazard alerts do not take account of usage patterns or exposure, thus do not represent risk.
Environmental fate |
Ecotoxicity |
Human health |
  |
  |
|
|
A non-pathogenic isolate of the bacterium Erwinia carotovora used to control soft rot disease |
|
Soft rot (Erwinia carotovora Holl.) |
|
Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa) |
|
- |
|
Erwinia carotovora is a Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacterium |
|
Class: Gamma Proteobacteria; Order: Enterobacteriales; Family: Enterobacteriaceae |
|
Not approved |
|
Not applicable |
|
No UK approval for use as a plant protection agent |
EC Regulation 1107/2009 (repealing 91/414) |
|
Not approved |
|
Not applicable |
|
Not applicable |
|
Not applicable |
|
No |
|
ATAustria |
BEBelgium |
BGBulgaria |
CYCyprus |
CZCzech Republic |
DEGermany |
DKDenmark |
EEEstonia |
ELGreece |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
ESSpain |
FIFinland |
FRFrance |
HRCroatia |
HUHungary |
IEIreland |
ITItaly |
LTLithuania |
LULuxembourg |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
LVLatvia |
MTMalta |
NLNetherlands |
PLPoland |
PTPortugal |
RORomania |
SESweden |
SISlovenia |
SKSlovakia |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
|
|
ISIceland |
NONorway |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
No |
|
Fungicide |
|
Micro-organism |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Natural |
|
Out competes pathogens for potential invasion sites preventing the disease establishing |
|
A non-pathogenic isolate of the gram-negative bacterium Erwinia carotovora originally isolated from Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa) |
|
Crop protection |
|
Soft rot (Erwinia carotovora Holl.) |
|
Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Erwinia carotovora Holl. |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Not applicable |
|
Not applicable |
|
Not applicable |
|
BM02 |
|
- |
|
Bacterium |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Usually supplied as a suspension of spores that is mixed with water and used as a foliar spray |
|
Erwinia carotovora is produced commercially through a fermentation process. The selected strain is cultured in large bioreactors, under controlled conditions, within a fermentation medium containing nutrients such as glucose, yeast extract, and other carbon and nitrogen sources. After the fermentation is complete, the bacterial cells are harvested from the fermentation broth. This is typically done through centrifugation or filtration to separate the cells from the liquid medium. The harvested bacterial cells are then formulated into commercial products. |
|
As microbial-based biopesticide production processes tend to use fermentation-based production rather than chemical synthesis, have a lower fossil fuel input in formulation and active ingredient creation, and have reduced downstream emissions due to biodegradability and minimal soil disruption, the life-cycle GHG emissions are expected to be low. Whilst hard and precise data are not available, broad estimates suggest that typically emissions are likely to be below 5 kg CO₂e/kg. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
As this parameter is not normally measured directly, a surrogate measure is used: ‘Photochemical oxidative DT₅₀’. Where data is available, this can be found in the Fate Indices section below. |
|
- |
Soil adsorption and mobility |
|
None
Terrestrial ecotoxicology |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source No adverse effects identified or expected |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source No adverse effects identified or expected |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
Non-toxic |
L3 L = Pesticide manuals and hard copy reference books / other sources 3 = Unverified data of known source No adverse effects identified or expected |
Non-toxic |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source No adverse effects identified or expected |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source No adverse effects identified or expected |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
HUMAN HEALTH AND PROTECTION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Negligible risk to bystanders and consumers |
|
Negligible risk to farm workers |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
Carcinogen |
|
Endocrine disruptor |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
A0 A = Chromosome aberration (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; B0 B = DNA damage/repair (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; C0 C = Gene mutation (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; D0 D = Genome mutation (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; E3 E = Unspecified genotoxicity type (miscellaneous data source) 3 = Negative |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
Reproduction / development effects |
Acetyl cholinesterase inhibitor |
Neurotoxicant |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
Respiratory tract irritant |
Skin irritant |
Skin sensitiser |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
?Possibly, status not identified |
Eye irritant |
Phototoxicant |
  |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
No data found |
  |
|
|
No adverse health effects reported or known |
|
|
|
No information available |
|
- |
|
Not listed (Not listed) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
Erwinia carotovora |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Record last updated: |
25/08/2025 |
Contact: |
aeru@herts.ac.uk |
Please cite as: |
Lewis, K.A., Tzilivakis, J., Warner, D. and Green, A. (2016) An international database for pesticide risk assessments and management. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 22(4), 1050-1064. DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2015.1133242 |