Zinc sulphate |
![]() Last updated: 07/09/2025 |
![]() |
(Also known as: zinc sulfate; white vitriol; zinc vitriol; sulfuric acid zinc salt; sulphuric acid zinc salt) |
|
![]() |
|
An inorganic compound with antibacterial activity | |
---|---|---|
|
Used as a feed supplement to treat and prevent zinc deficiency and as a topical antisepetic for treating conditions such as foot rot | |
|
Sheep; Cattle |
Approval status |
|
Approved - usually available as an authorised veterinary medicine for general sale (AVM-GSL) | |
---|---|---|
|
Approved |
Chemical structure |
|
None | |
---|---|---|
|
ZnSO₄ | |
|
[O-]S(=O)(=O)[O-].[Zn+2] | |
|
No data | |
|
NWONKYPBYAMBJT-UHFFFAOYSA-L | |
|
InChI=1S/H2O4S.Zn/c1-5(2,3)4;/h(H2,1,2,3,4);/q;+2/p-2 | |
|
Yes |
General status |
|
Feed additive, Mineral supplement, Antiseptic, Astringent | |
---|---|---|
|
Inorganic compound | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
Synthetic | |
|
Antiseptic action results from the precipitation of protein and a cleaning action by the zinc ion | |
|
[No specific molecular target] | |
|
7733-02-0 | |
|
231-793-3 | |
|
- | |
|
089001 | |
|
- | |
|
Dermatologicals: Products for the treatment of claws and hoofs | |
|
QD51 | |
|
No | |
|
Allowed substance (Table 1: All food producing species) | |
|
161.47 | |
|
- | |
|
zinc sulphate | |
|
zinc sulphate | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
White powder |
Commercial |
|
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
- | |||
|
1966, recorded animal use; mid-1990s, first EU authorisation for animal health | |||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Usually formulated as feed additives or tablets when used a nutrional supplement or as topically-applied sprays, powders and ointments | |||
|
Zinc sulphate is typically produced by reacting zinc oxide or zinc carbonate with dilute sulphuric acid in a controlled chemical process. When zinc oxide is used, it dissolves in sulphuric acid to form zinc sulphate solution and water. The reaction is exothermic and requires careful temperature control. The resulting solution is then filtered to remove any insoluble impurities, and evaporated to concentrate the zinc sulphate. As the solution cools, crystals of zinc sulphate heptahydrate begin to form. | |||
|
The GHG emissions from zinc sulphate production depend heavily on the source material and energy inputs used in the process. While precise figures are scarce, according to the International Zinc Association, producing 1 tonne of special high-grade zinc, a common precursor for zinc sulphate, can emit between 1.5 to 3.5 tonnes of CO₂e, depending on the technology and energy mix. If zinc oxide is used as the starting material, the additional reaction with sulphuric acid contributes marginally to emissions, mostly through process heat and electricity consumption. The GHG footprint per tonne of zinc sulphate is likely to fall in the lower end of that range, especially if renewable energy is used. However, if fossil fuels dominate the energy supply, emissions can be significantly higher. |
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
220000 | V3 V = ChemID Online Databases; Chemspider; PubChem. (ChemID ) 3 = Unverified data of known source |
High | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
Decomposes before melting | Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source |
- | ||||||||
|
Decomposes before boiling | Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source |
- | ||||||||
|
680 | Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source |
- | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
3.54 | Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source |
- | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
- | |||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
1.658 | V3 V = ChemID Online Databases; Chemspider; PubChem. (ChemID ) 3 = Unverified data of known source |
- | ||||||||
|
Substance may enter the environment via the urine and faeces of treated animals |
Degradation |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
As this parameter is not normally measured directly, a surrogate measure is used: ‘Photochemical oxidative DT₅₀’. Where data is available, this can be found in the Fate Indices section below. | ||||||||||
|
- |
Soil adsorption and mobility |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- |
Fate indices |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
- | - |
Known metabolites |
None
|
![]() |
Terrestrial ecotoxicology |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
> 1710 | Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources Rat3 = Unverified data of known source |
Moderate | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | |||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
> 600 | F4 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) Lumbricus terrestris 12 day4 = Verified data |
Moderate | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
- | |||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
- | |||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - |
Aquatic ecotoxicology |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
< 4.0 | F4 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) Oncorhynchus mykiss4 = Verified data |
Moderate | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
2.75 | F4 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) Danio rerio4 = Verified data |
Moderate | ||||||||
|
> 0.12 | F4 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) Daphnia magna4 = Verified data |
Moderate | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
> 0.02 | F4 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) Ceriodaphnia dubia4 = Verified data |
High | ||||||||
|
0.192 | V3 V = ChemID Online Databases; Chemspider; PubChem. (ChemID ) Americamysis bahia 7 day3 = Unverified data of known source |
Moderate | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
2.31 | F4 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) Spirodela polyrhiza4 = Verified data |
Moderate | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - |
|
- | - | - | |||
|
0.5 | F4 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) Crassostrea gigas4 = Verified data |
- |
|
![]() |
General |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
High (class III) | - | - | ||||||||
|
> 1710 | Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources Rat3 = Unverified data of known source |
Moderate | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
Subcutaneous LD₅₀ = 330 mg kg⁻¹ | V3 V = ChemID Online Databases; Chemspider; PubChem. (ChemID ) Rat3 = Unverified data of known source |
- | ||||||||
Intraperitoneal LD₅₀ = 196 mg kg⁻¹ | V3 V = ChemID Online Databases; Chemspider; PubChem. (ChemID ) Rat3 = Unverified data of known source |
- | |||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | |||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
Majority (~90%) excreted in the faeces with remainder in the urine | V3 V = ChemID Online Databases; Chemspider; PubChem. (ChemID ) 3 = Unverified data of known source |
- |
Health issues |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Harmful if ingested May cause respiratory problems Possible liver and kidney toxicant |
Handling issues |
|
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corrosive IMDG Transport Hazard Class 9 |
|||
|
- | |||
|
Not listed (Not listed) | |||
|
UN3077 | |||
|
Packaging Group III (minor danger) | |||
|
- |
|
![]() |
|
|
||
---|---|---|---|
|
zinc sulphate | ||
|
sulfate de zinc | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- |
Record last updated: | 07/09/2025 |
Contact: | aeru@herts.ac.uk |
Please cite as: | Lewis, K.A., Tzilivakis, J., Warner, D. and Green, A. (2016) An international database for pesticide risk assessments and management. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 22(4), 1050-1064. DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2015.1133242 |