Apramycin sulphate |
![]() Last updated: 13/09/2025 |
![]() |
(Also known as: apramycin sulphate) |
|
![]() |
|
An antibiotic and antibacterial compound used in veterinary medicine | |
---|---|---|
|
Typically used for the treatment of colibacillosis and salmonella in calves and bacterial enteritis in pigs and lambs | |
|
Pigs; Lambs; Cattle; Chickens; Rabbits |
Approval status |
|
Approved - usually supplied as aprescription only medicine to be authorised by a veterinarian (POM-V) | |
---|---|---|
|
Approved |
Chemical structure |
|
Apramycin sulphate exhibits complex stereoisomerism due to its highly branched and polycyclic structure, which includes multiple chiral centres. As an aminoglycoside antibiotic, it contains a central aminocyclitol ring linked to several sugar-like moieties, each contributing to the molecule’s stereochemical complexity. Only one stereoisomer of apramycin is biologically active. | |
---|---|---|
|
C₂₁H₄₃N₅O₁₅S | |
|
CNC1C(C2C(CC(C(O2)OC3C(CC(C(C3O)O)N)N)N)OC1OC4C(C(C(C(O4)CO)N)O)O)O.OS(=O)(=O)O | |
|
CN[C@H]1[C@H]([C@@H]2[C@H](C[C@H]([C@H](O2)O[C@@H]3[C@H](C[C@H]([C@@H]([C@H]3O)O)N)N)N)O[C@@H]1O[C@@H]4[C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O4)CO)N)O)O)O.OS(=O)(=O)O | |
|
WGLYHYWDYPSNPF-RQFIXDHTSA-N | |
|
InChI=1S/C21H41N5O11.H2O4S/c1-26-11-14(30)18-8(33-20(11)37-21-16(32)13(29)10(25)9(4-27)34-21)3-7(24)19(36-18)35-17-6(23)2-5(22)12(28)15(17)31;1-5(2,3)4/h5-21,26-32H,2-4,22-25H2,1H3;(H2,1,2,3,4)/t5-,6+,7-,8+,9-,10-,11+,12+,13+,14-,15-,16-,17-,18+,19+,20-,21-;/m1./s1 | |
|
Yes |
General status |
|
Antibiotic, Antimicrobial, Antibacterial | |
---|---|---|
|
Aminoglycoside | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
Synthetic | |
|
Inhibitor of protein synthesis in bacteria both in vivo and in vitro | |
|
[16S rRNA] | |
|
65710-07-8 | |
|
265-890-7 | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
3081544 | |
|
Antiinfectants for systemic use: Antibacterials for intramammary use; Alimentary tract & metabolism: Intestinal antiinfectants; Antiinfectants for systemic use: Antibacterials for systemic use | |
|
QJ51GB90; QA07AA92; QJ01GB90 | |
|
No | |
|
Allowed substance (Table 1: Bovine, Ovine, Pocine, Chicken, Rabbit) | |
|
637.7 | |
|
- | |
|
(2R,3R,4S,5S,6S)-2-[[(2R,3S,4R,4aR,6S,7R,8aS)-7-amino-6-[(1R,2R,3S,4R,6S)-4,6-diamino-2,3-dihydroxycyclohexyl]oxy-4-hydroxy-3-(methylamino)-2,3,4,4a,6,7,8,8a-octahydropyrano[3,2-b]pyran-2-yl]oxy]-5-amino-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxane-3,4-diol;sulfuric acid | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
Commercial |
|
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Current | |||
|
1980s, first clinical use | |||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Often supplied as a powder which is added to livestock's drinking water. Also available as premix and pour-on formulations | |||
|
Apramycin sulphate is produced through a fermentation-based process using the actinomycete bacterium Streptomyces tenebrarius, which naturally synthesises apramycin as a secondary metabolite. The production begins by culturing this microorganism in a nutrient-rich medium under carefully controlled conditions of temperature, pH, aeration, and agitation to optimsze yield. After fermentation, the broth is subjected to filtration and centrifugation to remove biomass, followed by extraction and purification steps that often involve ion-exchange resins or membrane separation to isolate apramycin. The purified compound is then reacted with sulfuric acid to form the sulphate salt. | |||
|
As microbial-based products tend to use fermentation-based production processes rather than chemical synthesis, they typically have a lower fossil fuel input in formulation and active ingredient creation, and also have reduced downstream emissions due to biodegradability and minimal soil disruption, their life-cycle GHG emissions are expected to be low. Whilst hard and precise data is not available, broad estimates suggest that typically emissions are likely to be below 5 kg CO₂e/kg. |
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
300000 | F3 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) 3 = Unverified data of known source |
High | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
245 | F3 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) 3 = Unverified data of known source |
- | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
3.48 X 1000 | Calculated | - | |||||||
|
0.542 | F3 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) 3 = Unverified data of known source |
Low | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
- | |||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
Main route into the environment from treated pigs is via animal urine and faeces. |
Degradation |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
365 | F3 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) 3 = Unverified data of known source |
Very persistent | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
DT₅₀ in soil is reported to be >1 year. Greenhouse studies suggest > 3 years (F3) | ||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
As this parameter is not normally measured directly, a surrogate measure is used: ‘Photochemical oxidative DT₅₀’. Where data is available, this can be found in the Fate Indices section below. | ||||||||||
|
- |
Soil adsorption and mobility |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- |
Fate indices |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
0.26 | F3 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) 3 = Unverified data of known source |
Low potential | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ND | - |
Known metabolites |
None
|
![]() |
Terrestrial ecotoxicology |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
> 4160 | F3 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) Rat3 = Unverified data of known source |
Low | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | |||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
> 1838 | F3 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) Anas platyrhynchos3 = Unverified data of known source |
Moderate | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
- | |||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
- | |||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - |
Aquatic ecotoxicology |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
191.6 | F3 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) Daphnia magna3 = Unverified data of known source |
Low | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - |
|
- | - | - | |||
|
- | - | - |
|
![]() |
General |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
High (class III) | - | - | ||||||||
|
> 4160 | F3 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) Rat3 = Unverified data of known source |
Low | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | |||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
Apramycin is rapidly absorbed when administered orally and is excreted via the kidneys without metabolisation. | Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source |
- |
Health issues |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Possible kidney toxicant |
Handling issues |
|
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
When heated to decomposition it emits acrid smoke and irritating fumes Corrosive |
|||
|
- | |||
|
Not listed (Not listed) | |||
|
- | |||
|
- | |||
|
- |
|
![]() |
|
|
||
---|---|---|---|
|
apramycin sulphate | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- |
Record last updated: | 13/09/2025 |
Contact: | aeru@herts.ac.uk |
Please cite as: | Lewis, K.A., Tzilivakis, J., Warner, D. and Green, A. (2016) An international database for pesticide risk assessments and management. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 22(4), 1050-1064. DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2015.1133242 |