| Aschersonia aleyrodis |

Last updated: 08/02/2026
|
 |
(Also known as: Red fungus) |
The following Pesticide Hazard Tricolour (PHT) alerts are based on the data in the tables below. An absence of an alert does not imply the substance has no implications for human health, biodiversity or the environment but just that we do not have the data to form a judgement. The alerts for Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHPs) are based on applying the FAO/WHO (Type 1) and the PAN (Type II) criteria to PPDB data. Further details on the HHP indicators are given in the tables below. Neither the PHT nor the HHP hazard alerts take account of usage patterns or exposure, thus they do not represent risk.
| PHT: Environmental fate |
PHT: Ecotoxicity |
PHT: Human health |
Highly Hazardous Pesticide |
|   |
  |
|
  |
|
|
A fungal pathogen used to control various insect pests |
|
|
Whitefly, in particular, the Citrus whitefly (Dialeurodes citri) and the Common greenhouse whitefly (Trialeurodes vaporariorum); Cicadas; Aphids; Planthoppers; Leafhoppers; Scale |
|
|
Citrus; Glasshouse crops |
|
|
- |
|
|
Red-yellow fungal growth. Infects nymphal instars of the whitefly but does not infect eggs and is less effective on adults. |
|
|
Class: Sordariomycetes; Order: Hypocreales; Family: Clavicipitaceae |
|
|
Not approved |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
No UK approval for use as a plant protection agent |
| EC Regulation 1107/2009 (repealing 91/414) |
|
|
Not approved |
|
|
- |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
- |
|
|
Yes |
|
|
ATAustria |
BEBelgium |
BGBulgaria |
CYCyprus |
CZCzech Republic |
DEGermany |
DKDenmark |
EEEstonia |
ELGreece |
|   |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
ESSpain |
FIFinland |
FRFrance |
HRCroatia |
HUHungary |
IEIreland |
ITItaly |
LTLithuania |
LULuxembourg |
|   |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
LVLatvia |
MTMalta |
NLNetherlands |
PLPoland |
PTPortugal |
RORomania |
SESweden |
SISlovenia |
SKSlovakia |
|   |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
|
|
|
ISIceland |
NONorway |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|   |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
|
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
No |
|
|
Insecticide |
|
|
Micro-organism |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Natural |
|
|
Parasitism |
|
|
Found predominately in tropical and subtropical climates and first used in Florida, USA |
|
|
Crop protection |
|
|
Whitefly, in particular, the Citrus whitefly (Dialeurodes citri) and the Common greenhouse whitefly (Trialeurodes vaporariorum); Cicadas; Aphids; Planthoppers; Leafhoppers; Scale |
|
|
Citrus; Glasshouse crops |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Aschersonia aleyrodis |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
| UK Poisons List Order 1972 |
Rotterdam Convention |
Montreal Protocol |
|
|
|
| Stockholm Convention |
OSPAR |
EU Water Framework Directive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
Not known |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
- |
|
|
Fungus |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
1949, first reported; early 1900s, first used in Florida, USA |
|
|
- Koppert Biological Systems
|
|
|
- Aschersonia aleyrodis spore and mycelium
|
|
|
- |
|
|
The first step in the commercial production of Aschersonia aleyrodis involves isolating the fungus from infected whiteflies or other natural sources. It is then cultured on a suitable growth medium, such as potato dextrose agar or solid substrates like rice or liquid fermentation media to produce spores. Once the fungus has grown and sporulated, the spores are harvested. This can be done by scraping them off the surface of the solid substrate or by filtering the liquid culture. The harvested spores are then formulated into a product that can be easily applied in the field. |
|
|
As microbial-based products tend to use fermentation-based production processes rather than chemical synthesis, they typically have a lower fossil fuel input in formulation and active ingredient creation, and also have reduced downstream emissions due to biodegradability and minimal soil disruption, their life-cycle GHG emissions are expected to be low. Whilst hard and precise data is not available, broad estimates suggest that typically emissions are likely to be below 5 kg CO₂e/kg. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
| - |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
As this parameter is not normally measured directly, a surrogate measure is used: ‘Photochemical oxidative DT₅₀’. Where data is available, this can be found in the Fate Indices section below. |
|
|
- |
| Soil adsorption and mobility |
|
None
| Terrestrial ecotoxicology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> 5050 |
Rat |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
No adverse effects identified or expected |
- |
|
|
- |
No adverse effects identified or expected |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
No adverse effects identified or expected |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Non-toxic |
No adverse effects identified or expected |
Non-toxic |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
| - |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
| - |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source No adverse effects identified or expected |
- |
|
|
- |
No adverse effects identified or expected |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
No adverse effects identified or expected |
- |
|
|
- |
No adverse effects identified or expected |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
| Regulatory Threshold Levels (RTLs) |
|
Note: These RTLs have been calculated using the regulatory approach used in the European Union and based on ecotoxocity values in the PPDB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
505 |
Worst case of acute and chronic mammals |
|
|
No data |
No data for acute and chronic birds |
|
|
No data |
No data for acute and chronic earthworms |
|
|
No data |
No data for non-target plants vegetative vigour and seedling emergence |
|
|
No data |
No data for contact and oral honeybees |
|
|
No data |
No data for parasitic wasps and predatory mites |
|
|
No data |
No data for temperate acute and chronic fish |
|
|
No data |
No data for temperate acute and chronic aquatic invertebrates |
|
|
No data |
No data for free-floating plants, rooted plants, acute and chronic algae |
| HUMAN HEALTH AND PROTECTION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable |
- |
- |
|
|
> 5050 |
Rat |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
| Carcinogen |
|
Endocrine disruptor |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
A0 A = Chromosome aberration (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; B0 B = DNA damage/repair (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; C0 C = Gene mutation (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; D0 D = Genome mutation (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; E3 E = Unspecified genotoxicity type (miscellaneous data source) 3 = Negative |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
| Reproduction / development effects |
Acetyl cholinesterase inhibitor |
Neurotoxicant |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
| Respiratory tract irritant |
Skin irritant |
Skin sensitiser |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
?Possibly, status not identified |
| Eye irritant |
Phototoxicant |
  |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
No data found |
  |
|
|
|
Not expected to produce harmful effects in humans |
|
|
|
|
|
No information available |
|
|
- |
|
|
Not listed (Not listed) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
aschersonia aleyrodis |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
| Record last updated: |
08/02/2026 |
| Contact: |
aeru@herts.ac.uk |
| Please cite as: |
Lewis, K.A., Tzilivakis, J., Warner, D. and Green, A. (2016) An international database for pesticide risk assessments and management. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 22(4), 1050-1064. DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2015.1133242 |
© Copyright University of Hertfordshire, 2006-2026. All Rights Reserved
Your use of this website and its various databases is subject to the terms detailed in the University of Hertfordshire’s copyright and IPR statement that can be found at
https://www.herts.ac.uk/about-us/legal.
In addition, your use of this website and its various databases is subject to the terms of this additional Copyright Statement and the database
Conditions of use document.
Unless explicitly stated otherwise, the content of this website and databases are owned and controlled by the University of Hertfordshire. Site content, including its selection and arrangement, is owned by the University of Hertfordshire and is protected by copyright and other laws.
Except as otherwise expressly permitted under copyright law or within the database Conditions of Use document, the content of this site may not be copied, reproduced, republished, downloaded, posted, broadcast or transmitted in any way without first obtaining the University of Hertfordshire’s written permission.
By using our databases the user is deemed to have agreed to comply with all of the terms and conditions as described above and within all relevant documentation.