| Metschnikowia fructicola strain NRRL Y-27328 |

Last updated: 08/02/2026
|
 |
(Not known by any other names) |
| A naturally occuring and widespread yeast with fungicidal activity. It is mainly used for controlling storage rot in fuit. Other than its potential to induce skin sensitivity no health impacts have been identified. It does not persist in soil sytems but may survive on treated plants for several weeks. It is not expected to pose a threat to biodiversity. |
The following Pesticide Hazard Tricolour (PHT) alerts are based on the data in the tables below. An absence of an alert does not imply the substance has no implications for human health, biodiversity or the environment but just that we do not have the data to form a judgement. The alerts for Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHPs) are based on applying the FAO/WHO (Type 1) and the PAN (Type II) criteria to PPDB data. Further details on the HHP indicators are given in the tables below. Neither the PHT nor the HHP hazard alerts take account of usage patterns or exposure, thus they do not represent risk.
| PHT: Environmental fate |
PHT: Ecotoxicity |
PHT: Human health |
Highly Hazardous Pesticide |
|   |
|
|
  |
|
|
A newly identified species of a Metschnikowia yeast that can control storage rots. |
|
|
Grey mold (Botrytis cinerea); Aspergillus molds; Brown rot (Monilinia fructigena, Monilia laxa) |
|
|
Grapes; Strawberry; Raspberry; Blueberry; Stone fruits |
|
|
A very new product and so not yet established. |
|
|
- |
|
|
Class: Saccharomycetes; Order: Saccharomycetales; Family: Metschnikowiaceae |
|
|
Approved |
|
|
27/12/2028 |
|
|
Not applicable |
| EC Regulation 1107/2009 (repealing 91/414) |
|
|
Approved |
|
|
France |
|
|
27/12/2028 |
|
|
No |
|
|
Yes |
|
|
ATAustria |
BEBelgium |
BGBulgaria |
CYCyprus |
CZCzech Republic |
DEGermany |
DKDenmark |
EEEstonia |
ELGreece |
|   |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
✓ |
ESSpain |
FIFinland |
FRFrance |
HRCroatia |
HUHungary |
IEIreland |
ITItaly |
LTLithuania |
LULuxembourg |
|   |
  |
✓ |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
LVLatvia |
MTMalta |
NLNetherlands |
PLPoland |
PTPortugal |
RORomania |
SESweden |
SISlovenia |
SKSlovakia |
|   |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
|
|
|
ISIceland |
NONorway |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|   |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
|
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
No |
|
|
Fungicide |
|
|
Micro-organism |
|
|
1.0E-10 CFU/g |
|
|
- |
|
|
Natural |
|
|
Provides competition for space and nutrients as well as releasing chitinolytic enzymes that may inhibit the growth of many fungal diseases |
|
|
Originally isolated from grapes grown in central Israel. Metschnikowia spp. are widespread in the natural environment |
|
|
Harvested crop protection |
|
|
Botrytis cinerea; Aspergillus spp.; Monilinia fructigena' Monilia laxa |
|
|
Grapes; Strawberry; Raspberry; Blueberry; Stone fruits |
|
|
Suitable for IPM where approved for use |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Metschnikowia fructicola strain NRRL Y-27328 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
| UK Poisons List Order 1972 |
Rotterdam Convention |
Montreal Protocol |
|
|
|
| Stockholm Convention |
OSPAR |
EU Water Framework Directive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
BM02 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Yeast |
|
|
|
|
|
Current; Novel |
|
|
Circa 2006, introduced |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Usually formulated as wettable granules. |
|
|
The commercial production of Metschnikowia fructicola strains are cultivated under sterile, nutrient-rich fermentation conditions that promote high cell density and viability. Once grown, the yeast biomass is harvested, typically through centrifugation or filtration, and then formulated. |
|
|
As microbial-based products tend to use fermentation-based production processes rather than chemical synthesis, they typically have a lower fossil fuel input in formulation and active ingredient creation, and also have reduced downstream emissions due to biodegradability and minimal soil disruption, their life-cycle GHG emissions are expected to be low. Whilst hard and precise data is not available, broad estimates suggest that typically emissions are likely to be below 5 kg CO₂e/kg. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
| - |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
EU 2017 dossier - comcentrations decline rapidly in the soil. |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
As this parameter is not normally measured directly, a surrogate measure is used: ‘Photochemical oxidative DT₅₀’. Where data is available, this can be found in the Fate Indices section below. |
|
|
- |
| Soil adsorption and mobility |
|
None
| Terrestrial ecotoxicology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> 2500 |
Rat |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
> 250 |
Apis mellifera |
Low |
|
|
> 279 |
Apis mellifera |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
| - |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
| - |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
> 100 |
Daphnia magna |
Low |
|
|
> 12.5 |
Daphnia magna 21 day |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
> 100 |
Desmodesmus subspicatus |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
| Regulatory Threshold Levels (RTLs) |
|
Note: These RTLs have been calculated using the regulatory approach used in the European Union and based on ecotoxocity values in the PPDB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
Worst case of acute and chronic mammals |
|
|
No data |
No data for acute and chronic birds |
|
|
No data |
No data for acute and chronic earthworms |
|
|
No data |
No data for non-target plants vegetative vigour and seedling emergence |
|
|
5 |
Worst case of contact and oral honeybees |
|
|
No data |
No data for parasitic wasps and predatory mites |
|
|
No data |
No data for temperate acute and chronic fish |
|
|
1 |
Worst case of temperate acute and chronic aquatic invertebrates |
|
|
10 |
Worst case of free-floating plants, rooted plants, acute and chronic algae |
| HUMAN HEALTH AND PROTECTION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable |
- |
- |
|
|
> 2500 |
Rat |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
> 2000 |
Rat |
- |
|
|
> 2.05E+06 |
Rat as CFU animal⁻¹ |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
None allocated |
|
- |
|
|
None allocated |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
None allocated |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
Negligible risk to bystanders and consumers |
|
|
Negligible risk to farm workers but due to sensitisation issues PPC/PPE advised |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
| Carcinogen |
|
Endocrine disruptor |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
A0 A = Chromosome aberration (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; B0 B = DNA damage/repair (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; C0 C = Gene mutation (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; D0 D = Genome mutation (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; E3 E = Unspecified genotoxicity type (miscellaneous data source) 3 = Negative |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
| Reproduction / development effects |
Acetyl cholinesterase inhibitor |
Neurotoxicant |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
| Respiratory tract irritant |
Skin irritant |
Skin sensitiser |
?Possibly, status not identified |
?Possibly, status not identified |
?Possibly, status not identified |
| Eye irritant |
Phototoxicant |
  |
?Possibly, status not identified |
No data found |
  |
|
|
|
A potential skin sensitizer - may cause allergic reactions No evidence of chronic health issues identified |
|
|
|
|
|
No information available |
|
|
- |
|
|
Not listed (Not listed) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Metschnikowia fructicola strain NRRL Y-27328 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
| Record last updated: |
08/02/2026 |
| Contact: |
aeru@herts.ac.uk |
| Please cite as: |
Lewis, K.A., Tzilivakis, J., Warner, D. and Green, A. (2016) An international database for pesticide risk assessments and management. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 22(4), 1050-1064. DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2015.1133242 |
© Copyright University of Hertfordshire, 2006-2026. All Rights Reserved
Your use of this website and its various databases is subject to the terms detailed in the University of Hertfordshire’s copyright and IPR statement that can be found at
https://www.herts.ac.uk/about-us/legal.
In addition, your use of this website and its various databases is subject to the terms of this additional Copyright Statement and the database
Conditions of use document.
Unless explicitly stated otherwise, the content of this website and databases are owned and controlled by the University of Hertfordshire. Site content, including its selection and arrangement, is owned by the University of Hertfordshire and is protected by copyright and other laws.
Except as otherwise expressly permitted under copyright law or within the database Conditions of Use document, the content of this site may not be copied, reproduced, republished, downloaded, posted, broadcast or transmitted in any way without first obtaining the University of Hertfordshire’s written permission.
By using our databases the user is deemed to have agreed to comply with all of the terms and conditions as described above and within all relevant documentation.