| Agrobody ASFBIOF01-02 |

Last updated: 29/04/2026
|
 |
(Also known as: Agrobody, anti-fungal VHH; ASFBIOF01-02 Polypeptide) |
The following Pesticide Hazard Tricolour (PHT) alerts are based on the data in the tables below. An absence of an alert does not imply the substance has no implications for human health, biodiversity or the environment but just that we do not have the data to form a judgement. The alerts for Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHPs) are based on applying the FAO/WHO (Type 1) and the PAN (Type II) criteria to PPDB data. Further details on the HHP indicators are given in the tables below. Neither the PHT nor the HHP hazard alerts take account of usage patterns or exposure, thus they do not represent risk.
| PHT: Environmental fate |
PHT: Ecotoxicity |
PHT: Human health |
Highly Hazardous Pesticide |
|   |
|
|
  |
|
|
A novel protein-based, broad-spectrum biofungicide, used pre-and post-harvest, developed using the innovative Agrobody Foundry Platform |
|
|
Grey mould (Botrytis cinerea); Powdery mildew |
|
|
Fruit including citrus, pome, berries and stone fruit; Vegetables; Grapes; Ornamentals; Hemp; Tobacco |
|
|
Field trials demonstrate moderate fungal control compared with traditional low risk fungicides. Works best at low to moderate pest pressure. In specific grape varieties when grown in the Mediterranean zone and strawberry grown under protected conditions some phytotoxic symptoms (necrosis) were observed. |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Not approved |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
No UK approval for use as a crop protection agent |
| EC Regulation 1107/2009 (repealing 91/414) |
|
|
Pending |
|
|
Netherlands |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
No |
|
|
Yes |
|
|
ATAustria |
BEBelgium |
BGBulgaria |
CYCyprus |
CZCzech Republic |
DEGermany |
DKDenmark |
EEEstonia |
ELGreece |
|   |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
ESSpain |
FIFinland |
FRFrance |
HRCroatia |
HUHungary |
IEIreland |
ITItaly |
LTLithuania |
LULuxembourg |
|   |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
LVLatvia |
MTMalta |
NLNetherlands |
PLPoland |
PTPortugal |
RORomania |
SESweden |
SISlovenia |
SKSlovakia |
|   |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
|
|
|
ISIceland |
NONorway |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|   |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
|
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
C₅₇₇H₉₀₅N₁₆₉O₁₇₇S₄ |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
No |
|
|
Fungicide |
|
|
Peptide fungicide; Animal-derived fungicide |
|
|
1.5 – 2.3 % w/w (technical grade) |
|
|
EFSA 2026: no relevant impurities |
|
|
Natural |
|
|
Substance binds to fungal membranes, disrupting its integrity which causes cell rupture and fungal death |
|
|
Proteins inspired by the top fragment of an antibody generated by Camelidae. The substance is an antigen binding fragment of an antibody that was originally identified in llamas immunised with a lipid extract from the phytopathogenic fungus Fusarium oxysporum. |
|
|
Crop protection |
|
|
Suitable for all farming systems where approved for use in that country |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
13200 |
|
|
Agrobody antifungal VHH (ASFB10F01-02) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
| UK Poisons List Order 1972 |
Rotterdam Convention |
Montreal Protocol |
|
|
|
| Stockholm Convention |
OSPAR |
EU Water Framework Directive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
F10 (under Group 51) |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
Formulated as a solid product |
|
|
|
|
|
Novel |
|
|
2025, registered USA; 2026, approval sought EU |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplied as a water-soluble granule formulation which can be applied via foliar spraying, dipping, drenching or mist/fogging |
|
|
The biofungicide is manufactured through an industrial scale bioprocess and formulated to meet farmers' practice, ensuring consistent high performance and novel modes of action. The bioactive ingredients are produced by fermentation in simple microorganisms such as yeast followed by filtration steps, limiting the amount of energy and waste from the production. |
|
|
Fermentation-based production processes typically have a low fossil fuel input in formulation and active ingredient creation, and also have reduced downstream emissions due to biodegradability and minimal soil disruption, their life-cycle GHG emissions are expected to be low. Whilst hard and precise data is not available, broad estimates suggest that typically emissions are likely to be below 5 kg CO₂e/kg. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1000000 |
|
High |
|
|
10000 |
Acetone |
- |
| 10000 |
Methanol |
- |
| 10000 |
Ethyl acetate |
- |
| 10000 |
n-Heptane |
- |
|
|
-5 |
|
- |
|
|
98 |
|
- |
|
|
None observed |
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Not applicable |
|
- |
| No dissociation |
|
|
2.06 X 1006 |
|
Highly volatile. If applied directly to plants or soil, drift is a concern & mitigation is advisable |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Max. between 210-215 nm. No significant absorbance observed between 290-400 nm (and expected up to 700 nm) |
|
- |
|
|
38.72 |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biodegradable |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Rapid environmental dispersal leaving no residues - proteins degrade into smaller peptides and further into amino acids, |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
As this parameter is not normally measured directly, a surrogate measure is used: ‘Photochemical oxidative DT₅₀’. Where data is available, this can be found in the Fate Indices section below. |
|
|
- |
| Soil adsorption and mobility |
|
None
| Terrestrial ecotoxicology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> 5000 |
Rat |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
> 394 |
Coturnix japonica |
Moderate |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
> 1000 |
Eisenia foetida |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
> 900 |
10 plants tested |
- |
|
|
> 900 |
10 plants tested |
- |
|
|
|
> 101 |
R4 R = Peer reviewed scientific publications 4 = Verified data Apis mellifera |
Low |
|
|
> 81.5 |
R4 R = Peer reviewed scientific publications 4 = Verified data Apis mellifera |
Moderate |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
> 80.0 |
R4 R = Peer reviewed scientific publications 4 = Verified data Bombus spp. |
Moderate |
| - |
|
|
> 99.4 |
R4 R = Peer reviewed scientific publications 4 = Verified data Bombus spp. |
Moderate |
| - |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
> 2100 |
Aphidius rhopalosiphi |
Low |
|
|
> 2100 |
Typhlodromus pyri |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> 76.1 |
R4 R = Peer reviewed scientific publications 4 = Verified data Unknown species |
Moderate |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
> 63.3 |
Danio rerio |
Moderate |
|
|
> 100 |
Daphnia magna |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
63.4 |
R4 R = Peer reviewed scientific publications 4 = Verified data Green algae |
Low |
|
|
0.294 |
R4 R = Peer reviewed scientific publications 4 = Verified data Green algae |
Moderate |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
| Regulatory Threshold Levels (RTLs) |
|
Note: These RTLs have been calculated using the regulatory approach used in the European Union and based on ecotoxocity values in the PPDB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
Worst case of acute and chronic mammals |
|
|
39.4 |
Worst case of acute and chronic birds |
|
|
200 |
Worst case of acute and chronic earthworms |
|
|
180 |
Worst case of non-target plants vegetative vigour and seedling emergence |
|
|
1.63 |
Worst case of contact and oral honeybees |
|
|
1050 |
Worst case of parasitic wasps and predatory mites |
|
|
0.761 |
Worst case of temperate acute and chronic fish |
|
|
1 |
Worst case of temperate acute and chronic aquatic invertebrates |
|
|
0.0294 |
Worst case of free-floating plants, rooted plants, acute and chronic algae |
| HUMAN HEALTH AND PROTECTION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not applicable |
- |
- |
|
|
> 5000 |
Rat |
Low |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
> 5000 |
Rat |
- |
|
|
> 2.02 |
Rat 4 hr |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
None allocated |
|
- |
|
|
None allocated |
|
- |
|
|
None allocated |
|
- |
|
|
None allocated |
|
- |
|
|
10-50% |
default |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
No significant risks identified or anticipated |
|
|
No significant risks identified or anticipated |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
| Carcinogen |
|
Endocrine disruptor |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
A0 A = Chromosome aberration (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; B0 B = DNA damage/repair (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; C0 C = Gene mutation (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; D0 D = Genome mutation (EFSA database) 0 = No data ; E3 E = Unspecified genotoxicity type (miscellaneous data source) 3 = Negative |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
| Reproduction / development effects |
Acetyl cholinesterase inhibitor |
Neurotoxicant |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
| Respiratory tract irritant |
Skin irritant |
Skin sensitiser |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
?Possibly, status not identified |
| Eye irritant |
Phototoxicant |
  |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
XNo, known not to cause a problem |
  |
|
|
|
Exposure should not result in unreasonable adverse effects to humans |
|
|
|
|
|
Not explosive or oxidising Not highly flammable; Not expected to auto-ignite |
|
|
Health: H317 |
|
|
Not listed |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Agrobody ASFBIOF01-02 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
| Record last updated: |
29/04/2026 |
| Contact: |
aeru@herts.ac.uk |
| Please cite as: |
Lewis, K.A., Tzilivakis, J., Warner, D. and Green, A. (2016) An international database for pesticide risk assessments and management. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 22(4), 1050-1064. DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2015.1133242 |
© Copyright University of Hertfordshire, 2006-2026. All Rights Reserved
Your use of this website and its various databases is subject to the terms detailed in the University of Hertfordshire’s copyright and IPR statement that can be found at
https://www.herts.ac.uk/about-us/legal.
In addition, your use of this website and its various databases is subject to the terms of this additional Copyright Statement and the database
Conditions of use document.
Unless explicitly stated otherwise, the content of this website and databases are owned and controlled by the University of Hertfordshire. Site content, including its selection and arrangement, is owned by the University of Hertfordshire and is protected by copyright and other laws.
Except as otherwise expressly permitted under copyright law or within the database Conditions of Use document, the content of this site may not be copied, reproduced, republished, downloaded, posted, broadcast or transmitted in any way without first obtaining the University of Hertfordshire’s written permission.
By using our databases the user is deemed to have agreed to comply with all of the terms and conditions as described above and within all relevant documentation.