Febantel |
![]() Last updated: 15/09/2025 |
![]() |
(Also known as: febantelum) |
|
![]() |
|
A benzimidazole drug used as a antiparasitic veterinary treatment | |
---|---|---|
|
Used to control gastrointestinal parasites | |
|
Sheep; Cattle; Horses; Elephants; Pigeons; Dogs |
Approval status |
|
Approved - for non-food animal use it may be supplied without a prescription by a suitable qualified person (NFA-VPS) | |
---|---|---|
|
Approved |
Chemical structure |
|
Febantel exhibits structural isomerism and stereoisomerism due to its complex molecular architecture. As a benzimidazole derivative with multiple functional groups, including methoxycarbonyl, phenylthio, and guanidino moieties, febantel can exist in different positional isomers, depending on the arrangement of these substituents on the aromatic rings. Additionally, the molecule contains chiral centres, particularly around the guanidino and carbamate groups, which allow for optical isomerism (enantiomers or diastereomers). These isomeric forms can influence the drug’s pharmacokinetics and biological activity. Moreover, febantel is known to exhibit polymorphism, meaning it can crystallise in more than one solid-state form, each with distinct physical properties such as solubility and stability. | |
---|---|---|
|
C₂₀H₂₂N₄O₆S | |
|
COCC(=O)NC1=C(C=CC(=C1)SC2=CC=CC=C2)NC(=NC(=O)OC)NC(=O)OC | |
|
COCC(=O)NC1=C(C=CC(=C1)SC2=CC=CC=C2)N/C(=N\C(=O)OC)/NC(=O)OC | |
|
HMCCXLBXIJMERM-UHFFFAOYSA-N | |
|
InChI=1S/C20H22N4O6S/c1-28-12-17(25)21-16-11-14(31-13-7-5-4-6-8-13)9-10-15(16)22-18(23-19(26)29-2)24-20(27)30-3/h4-11H,12H2,1-3H3,(H,21,25)(H2,22,23,24,26,27) | |
|
Yes |
|
![]() |
Common Name | Relationship | Link |
---|---|---|
febantel | - | ![]() |
General status |
|
Antiparasitic | |
---|---|---|
|
Benzimidazole | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
Synthetic | |
|
Inhibits fumarate reductase in the worm, thereby blocking glucose uptake | |
|
[Fumarate reductase flavoprotein subunit, Antagonist] | |
|
58306-30-2 | |
|
261-205-0 | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
Antiparasitic products, insecticides & repellents: Anthelmintics | |
|
QP52AC05 | |
|
No | |
|
Allowed substance (Table 1: Ruminants, Porcine, Equidae) | |
|
446.48 | |
|
- | |
|
N-[-[2,3-bis-(methoxycarbonyl)-guanido]-5-(phenylthio)-phenyl]-2-methoxyacetamide | |
|
dimethyl [2-[2-(2-methoxyacetamido)-4-(phenylthio)phenyl] imidocarbonyl] dicarbamate | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
White to off-white powder |
Commercial |
|
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Current | |||
|
Circa 1975, introduced | |||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Usually formulated as tablets or other forms for oral administration | |||
|
The production of febantel involves a multi-step chemical synthesis starting from 5-chloro-2-nitroaniline, which undergoes a nucleophilic substitution with thiophenol in the presence of potassium carbonate to yield 2-nitro-5-phenylthioaniline. This intermediate is then acylated with methoxyacetyl chloride to form a nitroacetamide derivative, which is subsequently reduced using hydrazine hydrate to produce the corresponding amine. The final step involves condensation with S-methyl-N,N'-dimethoxycarbonyl isothiourea, resulting in the formation of febantel. | |||
|
Published GHG data is not available for most pharmaceuticals. However, according to industry, global averages suggest producing 1 kg of a typical active pharmaceutical ingredient can range from 10 to 100 kg CO₂e for small molecule drugs and potentially up to 1000 kg CO₂e for complex biologicals such as vaccines, depending on the drug type, its formulation, complexity of synthesis, solvent recovery, and energy sources used. |
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
130 | F3 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) 3 = Unverified data of known source |
- | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
3.39 X 1001 | Calculated | - | |||||||
|
1.53 | F3 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) 3 = Unverified data of known source |
Low | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
1.31 | F3 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) 3 = Unverified data of known source |
- | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
- | |||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
1.598 | F3 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) 3 = Unverified data of known source |
- | ||||||||
|
- |
Degradation |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
As this parameter is not normally measured directly, a surrogate measure is used: ‘Photochemical oxidative DT₅₀’. Where data is available, this can be found in the Fate Indices section below. | ||||||||||
|
- |
Soil adsorption and mobility |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- |
Fate indices |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
- | - |
Known soil and groundwater metabolites |
None
Other known metabolites |
|
|
|
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
fenbendazole (Ref: Hoe 881v) | - | Animal metabolism | - |
|
![]() |
Terrestrial ecotoxicology |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
> 10000 | F3 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) Rat3 = Unverified data of known source |
Low | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | |||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
- | |||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
- | |||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - |
Aquatic ecotoxicology |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
0.22 | F4 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) Daphnia magna4 = Verified data |
Moderate | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - |
|
- | - | - | |||
|
- | - | - |
|
![]() |
General |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
High (class III) | - | - | ||||||||
|
> 10000 | F3 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) Rat3 = Unverified data of known source |
Low | ||||||||
|
2000 | F3 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database / Miscellaneous WHO documents / FAO data, IPCS INCHEM data (US EPA Databases Related to Pesticide Risk Assessment ) Rabbit3 = Unverified data of known source |
- | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
Subcutaneous LD₅₀ > 10000 mg kg⁻¹ | V3 V = ChemID Online Databases; Chemspider; PubChem. (ChemID ) Rat3 = Unverified data of known source |
- | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | |||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
In sheep 85% of given dose 85% excreted within 4 days - 19% in urine and 66% in faeces. | A5 A = EU regulatory and evaluation data as published by EC, EFSA (RAR, DAR & Conclusion dossiers), EMA (e.g. EU Annex III PIC DGD) (EU - Pesticides database; EFSA Scientific Publications ) 5 = Verified data used for regulatory purposes |
- |
Health issues |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
No further information available |
Handling issues |
|
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
When heated to decomposition it emits very toxic fumes of NOx and SOx | |||
|
- | |||
|
Not listed (Not listed) | |||
|
- | |||
|
- | |||
|
- |
|
![]() |
|
|
||
---|---|---|---|
|
febantel | ||
|
febantel | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
febante | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- |
Record last updated: | 15/09/2025 |
Contact: | aeru@herts.ac.uk |
Please cite as: | Lewis, K.A., Tzilivakis, J., Warner, D. and Green, A. (2016) An international database for pesticide risk assessments and management. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 22(4), 1050-1064. DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2015.1133242 |