Nerolidol |
![]() Last updated: 23/08/2025 |
![]() |
(Also known as: peruviol; Spider mite alarm pheromone) |
|
![]() |
|
A naturally occurring substance that is a plant essential oil and also a component of the spider mite alarm pheromone | |
---|---|---|
|
- | |
|
- |
Approval status |
|
- | |
---|---|---|
|
- |
Chemical structure |
|
Nerolidol exhibits geometrical and optical isomerism, resulting in four stereoisomers. These arise from two key features in its structure: a double bond at the 6-position, which can exist in either cis (Z) or trans (E) configuration, and a chiral centre at carbon 3, where the hydroxyl group is attached. The combination of these features leads to four distinct stereoisomers: (3R,6Z), (3S,6Z), (3R,6E), and (3S,6E). | |
---|---|---|
|
C₁₅H₂₆O | |
|
CC(=CCCC(=CCCC(C)(C=C)O)C)C | |
|
CC(=CCC/C(=C/CCC(C)(C=C)O)/C)C | |
|
FQTLCLSUCSAZDY-SDNWHVSQSA-N | |
|
InChI=1S/C15H26O/c1-6-15(5,16)12-8-11-14(4)10-7-9-13(2)3/h6,9,11,16H,1,7-8,10,12H2,2-5H3/b14-11+ | |
|
Yes |
General status |
|
- | |
---|---|---|
|
Pheromone; Plant-derived substance; Animal-derived substance | |
|
>95% | |
|
- | |
|
Natural | |
|
Acts as an insect repellent and attractant | |
|
- | |
|
7212-44-4 | |
|
230-597-5 | |
|
- | |
|
128911 | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
222.37 | |
|
- | |
|
3,7,11-trimethyl-1,6,10-dodecatrien-3-ol | |
|
3-hydroxy-3,7,11-trimethyl-1,6,10-dodecatriene | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
- | |
|
Colourless to pale yellow clear oily liquid | |
|
Commercial |
|
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Current | |||
|
1987, first registered USA | |||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Usually supplied in slow release formulations that are used within pheromone dispensers | |||
|
Commercial production of nerolidol typically involves synthetic processes to meet industrial demand. One common method starts with linalool, which undergoes conversion to isopropyl acetate, followed by ethoxylation and hydrogenation reactions to yield nerolidol. | |||
|
While exact CO₂e values are not published for specific pheromones, some general information is available. The PHERA reported that biotechnological production (e.g. yeast fermentation) of pheromones can reduce GHG emissions by up to 90% compared to traditional chemical synthesis and GHG emissions are typically in the 5 to 10 kg CO₂e per kg of pheromone produced. Other sources suggest that small scale pheromone synthesis typically has emissions in the range 1 – 3 kg CO₂e per kg of pheromone produced. |
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
25 | V3 V = ChemID Online Databases; Chemspider; PubChem. (ChemID ) 3 = Unverified data of known source |
- | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
2.14 X 1005 | Calculated | - | |||||||
|
5.33 | Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source |
High | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
0.872 | Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source |
- | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
- | |||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
1.480 | Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources 3 = Unverified data of known source |
- | ||||||||
|
- |
Degradation |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
As this parameter is not normally measured directly, a surrogate measure is used: ‘Photochemical oxidative DT₅₀’. Where data is available, this can be found in the Fate Indices section below. | ||||||||||
|
- |
Soil adsorption and mobility |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- |
Fate indices |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
- | - |
Known metabolites |
None
|
![]() |
Terrestrial ecotoxicology |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
> 5000 | Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources Rat3 = Unverified data of known source |
Low | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | |||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
> 2000 | Q2 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources Unknown species2 = Unverified data of unknown source |
Low | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
> 1000 | Q2 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources Expert judgement2 = Unverified data of unknown source |
Low | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
> 100 | Q2 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources Expert judgement2 = Unverified data of unknown source |
Low | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
- | |||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
- | |||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
|
- | - | - | |||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - |
Aquatic ecotoxicology |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
> 100 | Q2 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources Expert judgement2 = Unverified data of unknown source |
Low | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | - | - |
|
- | - | - | |||
|
- | - | - |
|
![]() |
General |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
High (class III) | - | - | ||||||||
|
> 5000 | Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources Rat3 = Unverified data of known source |
Low | ||||||||
|
5000 | Q3 Q = Miscellaneous data from online sources Rabbit3 = Unverified data of known source |
- | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
- | - | - | ||||||||
|
|
- | |||||||||
|
- | ||||||||||
|
- | - | - |
Health issues |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
No adverse health issues identified |
Handling issues |
|
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
No information available | |||
|
- | |||
|
Not listed (Not listed) | |||
|
Not regulated | |||
|
- | |||
|
- |
|
![]() |
|
|
||
---|---|---|---|
|
nerolidol | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- | ||
|
- |
Record last updated: | 23/08/2025 |
Contact: | aeru@herts.ac.uk |
Please cite as: | Lewis, K.A., Tzilivakis, J., Warner, D. and Green, A. (2016) An international database for pesticide risk assessments and management. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 22(4), 1050-1064. DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2015.1133242 |